Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) and Its Long-Term Effects on Educational and Labour Market Outcomes

From the Rand Corporation Europe

By Janna van Belle
October 17, 2016

"For all children, the provision of high quality ECEC is beneficial in terms of cognitive and social development."

Research Questions
  • What are the social and economic outcomes related to ECEC attendance, both on the short term and in the long term?
  • To what extend do the results from US studies on ECEC outcomes transfer to the European context?
  • What can be done to optimize outcomes related to ECE attendance?

US studies have shown that the provision of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) is associated with positive social and economic outcomes, both in the short and long term.

This brief reviewed the available evidence on the short and long term outcomes of ECEC within the European context: how do existing differences between EU countries in ECEC implementation relate to outcomes?

Results show that:

  • For all children, the provision of high quality ECEC is beneficial in terms of cognitive and social development.
  • For children under three who come from a disadvantaged background both the duration of attendance and the quality of the provision is important, with longer attendance of good quality ECEC yielding best results.
  • ECEC quality benefits from provision through a unified system, where ECEC for under threes and older children is in one provision centre, as opposed to ECEC provided in a split system.
  • Availability and access, in combination with country-specific cultural norms and parental leave policies is strongly related to ECEC participation.

Optimizing the potential outcomes related to ECEC attendance depends on the successful integration of different policies: Increasing the number of places where ECEC is provided from an early age up to school age within one integrated setting will contribute to higher quality ECEC.

At the same time, lowering the age of guaranteed access and providing sufficient financial support to bridge the gap between sufficiently paid parental leave and the age of guaranteed access will contribute to higher participation.

Key Findings

  • For all children, the provision of high quality ECEC is beneficial in terms of cognitive and social development.
  • For children under three who come from a disadvantaged background both the duration of attendance and the quality of the provision is important, with longer attendance of good quality ECEC yielding best results.
  • ECEC quality benefits from provision through a unified system, where ECEC for under threes and older children is in one provision centre, as opposed to ECEC provided in a split system.
  • Availability and access, in combination with country-specific cultural norms and parental leave policies is strongly related to ECEC participation.

Recommendations
  • Optimizing the potential outcomes related to ECEC attendance depends on the successful integration of different policies: Increasing the number of places where ECEC is provided from an early age up to school age within one integrated setting will contribute to higher quality ECEC.
  • Lowering the age of guaranteed access and providing sufficient financial support to bridge the gap between sufficiently paid parental leave and the age of guaranteed access will contribute to higher participation.

Download the full report HERE.
(PDF; 33 pages; 2.9MB; Free)

1 comment:

  1. What then does it mean to be an educator? Does it signify something different than the assigned job title? What I have learned through my work in higher education is that becoming an educator is not an automatic process. Everyone who is teaching adult students is not functioning as an engaging and highly effective educator. However, it is possible to learn how to educate rather than teach and that requires making a commitment to the profession.http://www.writingdesk.pw/

    ReplyDelete